2023考研英语科目复习中,想要快速熟悉题型,掌握答题技巧,需要考生进行大量的练习。下面小编为大家准备了“2023考研英语二测试模拟卷:阅读理解 PartA Text1”,希望大家能在练习过程中不断的进行总结,提升答题技能。
2023考研英语二测试模拟卷:阅读理解 PartA Text1
SectionⅡ Reading Comprehension
Part A
Directions: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET . (40 points)
Text 1
A divided Supreme Court ruled Monday that police may take DNA samples when booking those arrested for serious crimes, narrowly upholding a Maryland law and opening the door to more widespread collection of DNA by law enforcement.
The court ruled 5 to 4 that government has a legitimate interest in collecting DNA from arrestees, just as it takes photographs and collects fingerprints. Rejecting the view that the practice constitutes an unlawful search, the majority said it was justified to establish the identity of the person in custody. “DNA identification represents an important advance in the techniques used by law enforcement to serve legitimate police concerns for as long as there have been arrests,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the majority.
The dissenters were three of the court’s liberals plus conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who amplified his displeasure by reading a summary of his dissent.“The court has cast aside a bedrock rule of our Fourth Amendment law: that the government may not search its citizens for evidence of crime unless there is a reasonable cause to believe that such evidence will be found,” In his dissent, Scalia wrote that the majority’s attempts to justify the use of DNA as an identification tool “taxes the naivety of the naive.” He added, “Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason.”
Kennedy said Maryland’s law is more limited than that. He noted that DNA can be taken only from those suspected of “serious” crime, that the sample is destroyed if the arrestee is not convicted, and that the DNA tests did not violate the privacy of the person by revealing genetic traits or medical information. Besides that, Kennedy said, DNA identification contains critical clues about whether an arrestee should be eligible for being released on bail or whether he would be likely to flee because he had committed a crime more serious than the one for which he was arrested.
But Scalia said “Solving unsolved crimes is a noble objective, but it occupies a lower place in the American noble objectives than the protection of our people from suspicionless law-enforcement ¬searches,” He concluded with a nod to the Framers of the Constitution: “I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of our liberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection.”
The decision was evidence of how the court’s ideological differences blur on Fourth Amendment ¬cases. Earlier this term, Scalia joined Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan to rule that bringing a police dog to a suspected drug dealer’s door without a warrant amounted to an unlawful search. And Scalia joined Sotomayor’s broad ruling in another case that held police officers generally must try to get a warrant before forcing uncooperative drunken-driving suspects to submit to a blood test.
21. The majority of Supreme Court Justices hold that the collection of DNA samples from arrestees_____.
A. overestimates the implications of techniques
B. provides an effective identification tool
C. serves the interest of the government
D. constitutes an illegal police search
22. According to Paragraph 3, Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent is largely out of_____.
A. his strict adherence to the Fourth Amendment law
B. his concern over misjudgment and wrong arrests
C. his defense of a citizen’s privacy in law enforcement
D. his doubt about the reliability of DNA identification
23. To which of the following would Kennedy agree, according to Paragraph 4?
A. Maryland’s law about DNA collection has obvious limitations and needs to be improved.
B. DNA samples should be taken from for both serious crimes and minor offences.
C. DNA samples collected from arrestees should be entered into a national DNA database.
D. DNA identification provides critical information about the potential danger posed by an arrestee.
24. By mentioning the Framers of the Constitution, Scalia intended to _____.
A. question the nobility of the judicial process of Maryland case
B. demonstrate the historic significance of Maryland case
C. denounce the court’s decision as against the protection of personal rights
D. illustrate the embarrassing DNA sample collection procedure
25. Which of the following is suggested in the last paragraph?
A. The court’s attitude on Fourth Amendment cases is increasingly apparent.
B. The justices usually split on decisions about the Fourth Amendment cases.
C. Scalia has an inconsistent attitude on the issue of law-enforcement searches.
D. The court sometimes goes against the Fourth Amendment deliberately.
以上是小编为大家准备的“2023考研英语二测试模拟卷:阅读理解 PartA Text1”,希望各位考生能通过有效的练习掌握题型,熟练运用方法来进行解题。