在大学英语四六级备考中，“刷真题” 始终是被无数考生验证过的核心策略，其价值远不止 “熟悉题型” 这么简单。它承载着教育部考试中心的命题逻辑，从听力场景的高频话题、阅读文章的选材方向，到写作翻译的核心话题，历年真题中反复出现的考点与规律，正是备考的 “风向标”。在开始深入探讨之前，先给大家推荐一个超实用的网站——[新东方] 英语四六级官网（https://cet4-6.xdf.cn/）。

这里不仅有最新的英语四六级考试资讯、真题资料，还能帮助你提升英语能力，为未来的职业发展打下坚实基础，毕竟春招、校招、大学夏令营中，英语水平可是关键竞争力之一哦！

In a Silicon Valley tech office, an Indian engineer on an H-1B visa leads a cloud computing project; in California’s Central Valley, a Mexican farmworker harvests tomatoes while checking immigration news; in Chicago’s protest squares, hundreds rally against mass deportation policies. These 2025 scenes capture the dual reality of new immigrants in America: they are both indispensable contributors to the economy and targets of divisive policy debates. Data from the Pew Research Center’s 2025 U.S. Immigration Landscape Report and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reveals three defining truths: new immigrants reshape America’s workforce and demographics, their integration is hindered by political polarization, and their presence ignites tensions between economic necessity and cultural identity. Together, these truths redefine 新移民在美国 (new immigrants in America) not as a transient issue, but a permanent force reshaping the nation’s social fabric.
A defining feature of 2025’s immigrant population is its diverse origins and skill profiles, creating two distinct but equally vital groups. On one end are high-skilled professionals, dominated by Indian immigrants who now make up America’s second-largest immigrant group. In 2024, 82% of H-1B visas for skilled workers went to Indians, with over 40% of U.S. IT jobs filled by visa holders from India . This group includes industry leaders like Google’s Sundar Pichai and Microsoft’s Satya Nadella, symbolizing their ascent in corporate America. On the other end are low-wage laborers, primarily from Mexico, who form the backbone of critical industries: 45% of agriculture workers, 30% of construction laborers, and 24% of service employees are immigrants . In Frisco, Texas, this demographic shift is stark: Indian Americans now constitute 32% of the population, up from just 2.5% in 2000—a 4510% increase driven by "chain migration," where one family member’s visa enables others to immigrate . "America’s immigrant story today is two tales in one," notes demographer Dr. Maria Gonzalez. "One of tech innovation, one of manual labor—and both are essential."
Economically, new immigrants are irreplaceable pillars of growth, yet their contribution is increasingly threatened by policy restrictions. Immigrants account for 20% of the U.S. workforce and drive at least 50% of job growth, according to Dallas Federal Reserve analysis . Their absence has already caused tangible harm: 2025 saw over 120,000 immigrants leave the labor market, leading to delayed harvests in California and 7,200 lost construction jobs in Riverside, California . The healthcare sector faces similar risks: 43% of U.S. home health aides are immigrants, and industry groups warn of a care crisis if deportation efforts intensify . Even high-skilled sectors feel the pinch: tech companies report a 19% talent gap due to stricter visa limits. "We talk about ‘securing the border,’ but we’re securing ourselves into an economic hole," argues labor economist Dr. Pia Orrenius. "Immigrants don’t just take jobs—they create them by filling gaps no one else will."
Politically, 2025 has amplified tensions between restrictive policies and humanitarian concerns, centered on Trump’s "Immigration Policy 2.0." Key measures include expanded border walls, the reinstated "Remain in Mexico" policy for asylum seekers, and mass deportation plans targeting undocumented immigrants . These policies reflect a push to preserve white demographic and cultural dominance, as non-white immigrants now drive most U.S. population growth . Yet resistance is fierce: Democratic-led states like California and Massachusetts have passed laws limiting cooperation with federal immigration agents, expanding healthcare access for immigrants, and banning housing discrimination based on status . The Democratic Party itself is split: 58 House and Senate Democrats supported the Laken Riley Act, which mandates detention for immigrants accused of violent crimes, while others sue to block deportations . "Immigration has become our most polarizing issue because it’s about identity, not just law," explains political scientist Dr. James Wilson. "We’re fighting over who ‘belongs’ in America."
For individual immigrants, daily life is a balance of ambition and anxiety, shaped by legal status and community support. Undocumented workers like Lidia, a Mexican mother of three in California, live in constant fear of raids: "I’ve worked here 23 years, but one knock could send me back to start over" . High-skilled Indian immigrants face different stressors: lengthy green card waits (averaging 8+ years) and fears of visa revocation. Yet communities offer resilience: Indian enclaves in Texas maintain cultural traditions through temples and language schools, while Mexican neighborhoods in Chicago provide legal clinics and food banks . Young immigrants, or "DREAMers," straddle two worlds: 89% report feeling "American" but face barriers to college and employment. "Integration isn’t about forgetting where you’re from," says immigrant advocate Elizabeth Rodriguez. "It’s about being allowed to build a future here."
Looking ahead, the future of U.S. immigration hinges on reconciling necessity with values. Demographic trends are clear: by 2050, whites will no longer be a majority, making multiculturalism inevitable . Economic reality reinforces this: the aging U.S. population needs immigrant workers to fund Social Security and care for seniors. Policy solutions are emerging: a bipartisan proposal would expand H-1B visas for tech workers while creating a path to citizenship for farmworkers . Some states are leading the way: New Mexico’s "Fair Workweek" law extends labor protections to undocumented immigrants, reducing exploitation while boosting productivity. "The choice isn’t between ‘open borders’ and ‘closed borders,’" Dr. Gonzalez argues. "It’s between smart borders that welcome contributors and dumb borders that hurt us all."
As 2025 makes clear, new immigrants are not just part of America’s present—they are its future. They cure illnesses, build homes, code software, and feed communities. The policies that target them risk undermining the nation’s economic vitality and moral standing. Yet the resilience of immigrant communities and the growing recognition of their value offer hope. As Dr. Orrenius puts it: "America was built by immigrants who saw opportunity here. Today’s immigrants are no different—we just need to let them contribute."
Questions 46 to 50 are based on the above passage.
What characterizes the 2025 U.S. immigrant population according to the passage?
A) It is dominated by low-wage workers from Mexico.
B) It consists of two key groups with distinct skills.
C) It has seen a decline in Indian tech immigrants.
D) It makes up 45% of the total U.S. population.
Why are new immigrants considered "irreplaceable" to the U.S. economy?
A) They fill critical labor gaps in key industries.
B) They contribute 90% of agricultural output.
C) They hold most executive positions in tech firms.
D) They reduce the need for healthcare services.
What is the core goal of Trump’s Immigration Policy 2.0?
A) To address the labor shortage in construction.
B) To expand visa programs for skilled workers.
C) To maintain white demographic and cultural dominance.
D) To provide a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
How do Democratic-led states respond to restrictive federal immigration policies?
A) They fully cooperate with federal deportation efforts.
B) They pass laws to protect immigrants’ rights.
C) They ban all immigration from Latin America.
D) They cut funding for immigrant support programs.
What is the author’s core view on new immigrants in America?
A) They pose a threat to U.S. cultural identity and security.
B) Their contributions outweigh the challenges they bring.
C) High-skilled immigrants are more valuable than low-wage ones.
D) They should be restricted to preserve job opportunities for citizens.
Detailed Explanations
46. Answer: B
解析：根据第二段 “A defining feature of 2025’s immigrant population is its diverse origins and skill profiles, creating two distinct but equally vital groups” 可知，2025 年美国移民人口的核心特征是由高技能专业人才和低薪劳工两大群体构成，B 项正确。A 项 “以墨西哥低薪工人为主” 片面，原文强调两大群体 “同样重要”；C 项 “印度技术移民减少” 与 “82% 的 H-1B 签证发放给印度人” 矛盾；D 项 “占总人口 45%” 错误，45% 是移民在农业领域的劳动力占比。
47. Answer: A
解析：第三段明确指出移民填补了关键行业的劳动力缺口，如 “45% 的农业工人、30% 的建筑工人”，且劳动力流失已导致 “收获延误、岗位空缺”，说明其不可替代性源于对关键行业劳动力缺口的填补，A 项正确。B 项 “贡献 90% 农业产出” 原文未提及，仅提到移民是农业劳动力主力；C 项 “占据多数科技高管职位” 错误，原文举例说明有印度裔高管，但未提 “多数”；D 项 “减少医疗服务需求” 与 “43% 的家庭护工是移民” 相悖。
48. Answer: C
解析：第四段提到 “These policies reflect a push to preserve white demographic and cultural dominance, as non-white immigrants now drive most U.S. population growth”，即特朗普移民政策 2.0 的核心目标是维护白人的人口与文化主导地位，C 项正确。A 项 “解决建筑业劳动力短缺” 与政策 “导致岗位流失” 矛盾；B 项 “扩大技术签证” 是政策限制的内容；D 项 “为无证移民提供入籍途径” 是民主党部分人士的主张，与特朗普政策相反。
49. Answer: B
解析：第四段指出 “Democratic-led states like California and Massachusetts have passed laws limiting cooperation with federal immigration agents, expanding healthcare access for immigrants”，即民主党主导的州通过立法保护移民权利，B 项正确。A 项 “全力配合联邦驱逐行动” 与 “限制与联邦合作” 矛盾；C 项 “禁止拉美移民” 原文未提及；D 项 “削减移民支持资金” 与 “扩大医疗保障” 相悖。
50. Answer: B
解析：全文围绕移民的经济贡献（不可或缺的劳动力支柱）、社会价值（多元文化构成）展开，末段明确强调 “immigrants are not just part of America’s present—they are its future”，且指出限制移民 “可能损害国家经济活力”，可见作者核心观点为移民的贡献超过其带来的挑战，B 项正确。A 项 “威胁文化认同与安全” 是限制性政策支持者的观点，非作者立场；C 项 “高技能移民更有价值” 错误，原文强调两大群体 “同样重要”；D 项 “限制移民以保护公民就业” 与 “移民创造 50% 就业增长” 的事实矛盾。