2024年9月28日的雅思考试已经结束，本文将为大家带来这次考试写作部分的试题回忆与答案，以帮助广大考生更好地备考未来的雅思考试。

　　Historical objects in museums all over the world should be returned to its origin country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　建议思路：I tend to agree

　　同意归还：

　　1. 历史文物需要文化和历史归属感(sense of belonging )。这些历史物品是一个国家文化和历史的重要组成(component )部分，归还给原属国能让该国人民更好地感受和传承(inherit )自己的文化根源，增强民族认同感(identity )和自豪感(pride )。

　　2. 促进(promote )历史的完整性(integrity )和背景(background )理解。在原属国，这些物品能够置于其原本的历史、文化和社会背景中展示，有助于更全面和准确地理解其意义和价值。

　　3. 尊重(respect )该国的主权(sovereignty )和正义(justice )。原本就是从他国非法(illegal )掠夺(plunder )或不正当手段获取的，归还体现了对原属国主权的尊重和对历史不公正的纠正。

　　然而(however )，留在别的国家也有一些好处。

　　1. 促进(promote )全球文化交流(exchange )。放在世界各地的博物馆能促进不同文化之间的交流和相互理解，让更多人接触(contact )到多元的文化遗产。

　　2. 可能别国具有更好的保护和保存(preserve )条件(condition )。有些国家的博物馆可能具备更先进的保护技术和条件，能更好地保存这些历史物品，防止其受到损坏。

　　3. 可能涉及法律(law )和所有权(ownership )问题。经过长时间的流转，其所有权可能变得复杂，难以清晰界定，直接归还可能引发法律纠纷。

　　In conclusion (结论). 我认为根据物品的来源、现状、原属国的保存能力等因素综合考虑，对于一些重要且原属国具备良好保存条件的应当归还，而对于一些情况复杂或在现存放地能发挥更大教育交流作用的可以协商处理。

　　The debate over whether historical objects in museums worldwide should be returned to their country of origin is a contentious issue. I tend to agree with the argument that these objects should be returned. However, there are also valid reasons for some items to remain in foreign museums. This essay will discuss both perspectives before concluding with my view.

　　One of the strongest arguments for returning historical objects is the cultural and historical sense of belonging they provide to their origin countries. These artifacts are significant components of a nation's cultural heritage and history. By returning them, the local population can better inherit their cultural roots, fostering a deeper identity and national pride. This connection between the people and their cultural history is essential for the preservation of their heritage and pride in their past.

　　Furthermore, returning these objects promotes the integrity and understanding of their original historical and cultural background. When artifacts are displayed in their country of origin, they can be exhibited within the context of their native history, customs, and social framework. This allows for a more comprehensive and accurate interpretation of their meaning and value, which might be lost if the artifacts remain in a foreign context.

　　Another reason for returning historical objects is to show respect for the sovereignty of the origin country and restore justice. Many of these items were illegally plundered or taken through unjust means, often during periods of colonialism or conflict. Returning them symbolizes an acknowledgment of past wrongs and a move toward correcting these historical injustices.

　　However, there are arguments for keeping certain objects in foreign museums. One significant reason is that international museums promote global cultural exchange. Having artifacts from various countries on display around the world helps foster understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures. This contact with different cultural heritages can lead to greater mutual respect and understanding among nations. Moreover, some countries may have better facilities and resources to preserve historical objects. Many international museums possess more advanced technology and conditions for maintaining and restoring delicate artifacts. If an object’s country of origin lacks these preservation conditions, returning the item might lead to its deterioration, thereby causing irreversible damage to human history.

　　Lastly, returning artifacts might involve complex legal and ownership issues. Over time, these objects have passed through various hands, and their legal ownership may have become murky. In some cases, direct return could lead to legal disputes, making the process difficult and time-consuming.

　　In conclusion, I believe that decisions regarding the return of historical objects should be based on a comprehensive analysis of the artifact’s origin, current situation, and the preservation abilities of the original country.All efforts need to ensure the best outcome for both the origin country and the broader global community.