2024年12月28日的雅思考试已经结束，本文将为大家带来这次考试写作部分的试题回忆与答案，以帮助广大考生更好地备考未来的雅思考试。

　　Some people say it is acceptable to use animals for our benefit, others say it is wrong to exploit them. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.

　　建议思路：

　　使用动物为人类谋利可以接受：

　　1. 医疗进步：动物实验对医学发展至关重要。许多药物研发前期需要在动物身上测试疗效与安全性，像小白鼠(laboratory mice)，其生理结构与人类有相似之处，通过它们能初步了解药物作用机制，为人类攻克疾病如癌症、心脏病等带来希望，无数生命因这些实验成果得以挽救。

　　2. 食品供应：养殖家畜(Raising livestock)是传统且重要的食物来源。牛、羊、猪等为人类提供肉类，满足身体对蛋白质等营养需求，保障全球几十亿人口饮食，维持基本生存与生活能量。而且养殖产业带动大量就业，从饲养员到肉类加工从业者，推动经济发展。

　　3. 科研助力：除医学外，动物在其他科研领域作用突出。比如利用果蝇研究遗传学，其繁殖快、基因相对简单易观察，助科学家破解遗传密码，对农业选种、理解生物进化意义非凡，间接服务人类社会各方面。

　　然而，有些人认为利用动物是错误的：

　　1. 动物痛苦：在动物实验场景下，很多操作会给动物造成巨大痛苦。为模拟疾病，可能会对动物进行创伤性处理，而且实验环境狭小、压抑，动物失去自由，长时间处于恐惧、焦虑状态，违背动物天性，从伦理道德看十分残忍。

　　2. 生态失衡：过度捕猎(Overhunting)、商业性开发利用野生动物，破坏生态链。像为获取象牙大量捕杀大象，导致非洲草原生态系统中植物生长、其他动物生存受影响，许多物种濒临灭绝，生物多样性受损，最终反作用于人类，影响地球生态稳定。

　　3. 替代方案可行：随着科技发展，不少模拟技术、体外实验方法涌现。如人造皮肤、器官芯片可部分替代动物用于药物测试，电脑模拟能构建生物模型研究生态，既减少动物伤害，又能达到科研目的，没必要执着于传统动物利用方式。

　　个人观点：

　　应在必要与合理范围内利用动物，并不断探索替代方案。医学救命研究前期动物实验难以避免，但要严格规范流程、保障动物福利;养殖遵循可持续原则，避免过度集约化伤害动物。同时大力投入科研创新，尽早用更人道、环保的技术全面取代伤害动物的利用模式，实现人类发展与动物保护平衡。

　　The use of animals for human benefit has sparked significant debate. Some claim it is acceptable, while others contend that exploiting them is unethical. I tend to believe that animal use should be permitted within necessary and reasonable limits, while constantly exploring alternative solutions.

　　Proponents of using animals argue that it has led to substantial progress in various fields. Firstly, raising livestock is a traditional and essential source of food. Cattle, sheep, and pigs provide meat that meets the nutritional needs of billions of people, while also supporting jobs in farming, meat processing, and related industries. Furthermore, animal testing plays a critical role in medical advancements. Laboratory mice, for example, share similar physiological structures with humans, enabling scientists to test the safety and efficacy of drugs before they are used on humans. Such tests have led to breakthroughs in combating diseases like cancer and heart disease, saving countless lives. Lastly, animals contribute significantly to scientific research beyond medicine. For example, fruit flies, with their rapid reproduction rate and simple genetic structure, have helped scientists make advancements in genetics, which have implications for agriculture, evolutionary biology, and more.

　　However, others argue that exploiting animals is wrong for several reasons. One of the primary concerns is the suffering inflicted upon animals. In many research settings, animals endure immense pain through invasive procedures and confinement. This raises ethical concerns about the cruelty of such practices. In addition, with the advancement of technology, there are now viable alternatives to animal testing. Methods like organ-on-chip technologies and computer simulations can replicate biological processes without the need for live animals.

　　In conclusion, while animal use can be justified in some cases, it is crucial to ensure it is done within ethical and sustainable boundaries. Strict regulations should be implemented to safeguard animal welfare, and continued investment in alternative research methods should be prioritized. This balance can allow human progress while also protecting animal rights.